TSTP Solution File: ITP088^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ITP088^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jfbnH4wSo3 true
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:22:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 28.67s 4.36s
% Output : Refutation 28.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 27
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 20 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 106 ( 5 ~; 4 |; 0 &; 83 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 7 ( 6 usr)
% Number of type conns : 13 ( 13 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 17 ( 14 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% ( 6 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 6 ^; 6 !; 0 ?; 12 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(secrecy_specID_type,type,
secrecy_specID: $tType ).
thf(secrecy_Expression_type,type,
secrecy_Expression: $tType ).
thf(secrecy_Keys_type,type,
secrecy_Keys: $tType ).
thf(set_Secrecy_specID_type,type,
set_Secrecy_specID: $tType ).
thf(secrecy_KS_type,type,
secrecy_KS: $tType ).
thf(set_Secrecy_KS_type,type,
set_Secrecy_KS: $tType ).
thf(localSecrets_type,type,
localSecrets: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_KS ).
thf(q_type,type,
q: secrecy_specID ).
thf(member_Secrecy_KS_type,type,
member_Secrecy_KS: secrecy_KS > set_Secrecy_KS > $o ).
thf(p_type,type,
p: secrecy_specID ).
thf(knowle945212990e_know_type,type,
knowle945212990e_know: secrecy_specID > secrecy_KS > $o ).
thf(key_type,type,
key: secrecy_Keys ).
thf(pq_type,type,
pq: secrecy_specID ).
thf(secrecy_kE_type,type,
secrecy_kE: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_Expression ).
thf(insert1671894227specID_type,type,
insert1671894227specID: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID ).
thf(subcomponents_type,type,
subcomponents: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID ).
thf(ine_type,type,
ine: secrecy_specID > secrecy_Expression > $o ).
thf(correctCompositionIn_type,type,
correctCompositionIn: secrecy_specID > $o ).
thf(secrecy_kKS_type,type,
secrecy_kKS: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_KS ).
thf(bot_bo1785112429specID_type,type,
bot_bo1785112429specID: set_Secrecy_specID ).
thf(fact_0_assms_I4_J,axiom,
correctCompositionIn @ pq ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
correctCompositionIn @ pq,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_0_assms_I4_J]) ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
~ ( ine @ pq @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
ine @ pq @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl355,plain,
ine @ pq @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(fact_3_assms_I3_J,axiom,
( ( subcomponents @ pq )
= ( insert1671894227specID @ p @ ( insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
( ( subcomponents @ pq )
= ( insert1671894227specID @ p @ ( insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_3_assms_I3_J]) ).
thf(fact_1_assms_I2_J,axiom,
~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_1_assms_I2_J]) ).
thf(fact_6_know_Osimps_I1_J,axiom,
! [A: secrecy_specID,M: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ A @ ( secrecy_kKS @ M ) )
<=> ( ( ine @ A @ ( secrecy_kE @ M ) )
| ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ M ) @ ( localSecrets @ A ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: secrecy_specID] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ Y0 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ Y1 ) )
<=> ( ( ine @ Y0 @ ( secrecy_kE @ Y1 ) )
| ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ Y1 ) @ ( localSecrets @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_6_know_Osimps_I1_J]) ).
thf(fact_2_assms_I1_J,axiom,
~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ p @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ p @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_2_assms_I1_J]) ).
thf(fact_35_TBtheorem1a,axiom,
! [PQ: secrecy_specID,E: secrecy_Expression,P: secrecy_specID,Q: secrecy_specID] :
( ( ine @ PQ @ E )
=> ( ( ( subcomponents @ PQ )
= ( insert1671894227specID @ P @ ( insert1671894227specID @ Q @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) )
=> ( ( correctCompositionIn @ PQ )
=> ( ( ine @ Q @ E )
| ( ine @ P @ E ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl35,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: secrecy_specID] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: secrecy_Expression] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y2: secrecy_specID] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y3: secrecy_specID] :
( ( ine @ Y0 @ Y1 )
=> ( ( ( subcomponents @ Y0 )
= ( insert1671894227specID @ Y2 @ ( insert1671894227specID @ Y3 @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) )
=> ( ( correctCompositionIn @ Y0 )
=> ( ( ine @ Y3 @ Y1 )
| ( ine @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_35_TBtheorem1a]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3485,plain,
$false,
inference(eprover,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl0,zip_derived_cl355,zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl6,zip_derived_cl2,zip_derived_cl35]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ITP088^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jfbnH4wSo3 true
% 0.17/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 13:42:55 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.17/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.17/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.17/0.35 % Running in HO mode
% 0.20/0.64 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.20/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.20/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.20/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.20/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s
% 0.20/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 2.63/0.96 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s
% 28.67/4.36 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh.
% 28.67/4.36 % done 374 iterations in 3.624s
% 28.67/4.36 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 28.67/4.36 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 28.67/4.36
% 28.67/4.36
% 28.67/4.36 % Terminating...
% 28.88/4.46 % Runner terminated.
% 28.88/4.46 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------